Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017

HC Pinnacle Club Homeowners Association, INC. v. S.B. McLaughlin Associates, Inc.

HC Pinnacle Club Homeowners Association, INC. v. S.B. McLaughlin Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided November 15, 2017
HC Pinnacle Club Homeowners Association, INC. v. S.B. McLaughlin Associates, Inc.

Opinion

NO. 12-17-00024-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

HC PINNACLE CLUB § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT S.B. MCLAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

Appellant, HC Pinnacle Club Homeowners Association, Inc., and Appellee, S.B. McLaughlin Associates, Inc., have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement. The motion is signed by counsel for each party. Because the motion meets the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), we grant the joint motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Opinion delivered November 15, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT NOVEMBER 15, 2017 NO. 12-17-00024-CV

HC PINNACLE CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant

V. S.B. MCLAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Appellee

Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV15-0610-392)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion of the parties to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that the motion to dismiss be granted.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed and that all costs of this appeal be, and the same are, adjudged against the party that incurred them; for which execution may issue; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.