Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2017

Jane Doe and John Doe v. Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC Philip K. Broderick, Individually Andres A. Arguello, Individually Samantha Fenwich, Individually Schavon J. Jahn And Albert Zavala

Jane Doe and John Doe v. Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC Philip K. Broderick, Individually Andres A. Arguello, Individually Samantha Fenwich, Individually Schavon J. Jahn And Albert Zavala
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 5, 2017

Jane Doe and John Doe v. Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC Philip K. Broderick, Individually Andres A. Arguello, Individually Samantha Fenwich, Individually Schavon J. Jahn And Albert Zavala

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00683-CV

Jane Doe and John Doe, Appellants v. Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC; Philip K. Broderick, Individually; Andres A. Arguello, Individually; Samantha Fenwich, Individually; Schavon J. Jahn; and Albert Zavala, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 433RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C2017-0422D, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 1, 2017, we informed appellants that it appeared from the clerk’s record that they were attempting to appeal from an interlocutory order that was not immediately appealable under statute. We requested a response explaining how we might exercise jurisdiction over the appeal no later than November 17. To date, appellants have not responded to our letter.

We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c) (court of appeals may dismiss if appellant does not comply with notice from clerk requiring response within certain time). __________________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: December 5, 2017

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.