David Duran v. State
David Duran v. State
David Duran v. State
Opinion
ApP«a\ Wo- OZ- [l-OO^QS-C^ ,^e° ' . & 3%
«A
KM\.a -f. flU <=* £*fly ftr»«-f *^ *L*£A$i:.
-f„ f,i^ K*<h** •+- T^r* •* ^~rW kn«f ^^ 3^^^
-<jv^t
^^ f\A>j*+i*Jl
+"*-S^y *LsL*y \4 V>wiJ t)^^ ^U^Jt ?^<Sr ka^A
%^ JV*<- £vi-A i^-f Af^'t •i.-j,*^\j ^ i*-^ *,+ -^A <^v **-? 7'*w.
1Sn*-f 2^» «u^ Ww /Vpai ^i/*^/
-S*_ «_/l K^pysJ^fc— <-S *
?* p-wA Pvr*A 4m«-A ^f^^ —4 4c^iw.-v- Oui«-U V^*-Sre^-fv> i^y vSU-k^c^J
<L*jC fi-t\(ww 4~ sS^^^ /• 0-^"A b vrr*-A ^er^-As^j p ^_a^.\"^*# r^r
i^i«r^.*/i ^=> J-^fi. y x^^x t><\ (m.-w ^ / 2-s>( ^, 'T^ 1r "t- <^\i<-ric-r <-^( w, ^ *( C^-^r Pb-^^^K, tx ?ui«\ fc*f lu. 4 r-^ ^
P^4-*-. /U>^ •u^^>l^ M^-Xf^ :^3r fli <s <3> f>AS^ / i*-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.