COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-18-00167-CV

YOUNG JU PAK APPELLANT V. YOUNG EUN YANG APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 231-601904-16 ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- Appellant Young Ju Pak attempts to appeal from the trial court’s February 12, 2018 “Amended Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment,” which grants a bill of review but does not dispose of the merits of the underlying controversy between the parties. On May 25, 2018, we sent a letter to Appellant expressing our concern that we may not have jurisdiction over her appeal

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. because the order appealed from does not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that “the general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment”); Alaimo v. U.S. Bank Tr. Nat’l Ass’n, No. 02-16-00123-CV, 2017 WL 3633297, at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 24, 2017, no pet.) (holding that order granting bill of review that fails to dispose of the merits of the underlying controversy between the parties was not a final judgment). We stated that unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing this appeal by June 8, 2018, this appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We did not receive a response. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 12, 2018