Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2018

Tyquan Guzman v. State

Tyquan Guzman v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 3, 2018

Tyquan Guzman v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2018

NO. 03-18-00054-CR

Tyquan Guzman, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2018

NO. 03-18-00055-CR

Tyquan Guzman, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2018

NO. 03-18-00056-CR

Tyquan Guzman, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.