TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 17, 2018

NO. 03-17-00554-CR

Marcus Degrazia, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED—OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 17, 2018

NO. 03-17-00555-CR

Marcus Degrazia, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED—OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 17, 2018

NO. 03-17-00556-CR

Marcus Degrazia, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN AFFIRMED—OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.