Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia v. State
Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued August 30, 2018
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00328-CR ——————————— NACHIELI ZEPEDA-GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1563064
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia pleaded guilty to the felony offense of assault. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.01. In accordance with the terms of a plea- bargain agreement, the trial court signed a judgment of conviction imposing a two- year prison sentence. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial or (2) after obtaining the trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Here, neither applies.
The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports this conclusion. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
We dismiss the appeal. We also dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.