Raymond Boytim, Hugh Duncan, Walter Schwimmer, the Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust and the Edward J. Goodman Generation Skipping Trust, Jeffrey Whalen, and Howard Weissberg// Brigham Exploration Company v. Brigham Exploration Company Ben M. Brigham David T. Brigham Harold D. Carter Stephen C. Hurley Stephen P. Reynolds Hobart A. Smith, and Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA and Fargo Acquisition, Inc.// Raymond Boytim
Raymond Boytim, Hugh Duncan, Walter Schwimmer, the Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust and the Edward J. Goodman Generation Skipping Trust, Jeffrey Whalen, and Howard Weissberg// Brigham Exploration Company v. Brigham Exploration Company Ben M. Brigham David T. Brigham Harold D. Carter Stephen C. Hurley Stephen P. Reynolds Hobart A. Smith, and Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA and Fargo Acquisition, Inc.// Raymond Boytim
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 20, 2018
NO. 03-17-00722-CV
Appellants, Raymond Boytim, Hugh Duncan, Walter Schwimmer, the Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust and the Edward J. Goodman Generation Skipping Trust, Jeffrey Whalen, and Howard Weissberg // Cross-Appellants, Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C.
Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. v. Appellees, Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D.
Carter, Stephen C. Hurley, Stephen P. Reynolds, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. // Cross-Appellees, Raymond Boytim, Hugh Duncan, Walter Schwimmer, the Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust and the Edward J.
Goodman Generation Skipping Trust, Jeffrey Whalen, and Howard Weissberg
APPEAL FROM 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PURYEAR AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on October 19, 2017.
Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory order.
Appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.