Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2018

Tremaine Deshaun Rachal v. State

Tremaine Deshaun Rachal v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 27, 2018

Tremaine Deshaun Rachal v. State

Opinion

Order filed November 27, 2018.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-18-00120-CR ____________ TREMAINE DESHAUN RACHAL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1410271

ORDER The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. art. 38.22'6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions.

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this Court on or before December 28, 2018.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.