Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2018

Gordon N. Ridley v. State

Gordon N. Ridley v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 21, 2018

Gordon N. Ridley v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-18-00791-CR

Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-18-00792-CR

Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-18-00793-CR

Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-18-00794-CR

Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.