Gordon N. Ridley v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00791-CR
NO. 03-18-00792-CR
NO. 03-18-00793-CR
NO. 03-18-00794-CR
Gordon N. Ridley, Appellant v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY,
NOS. 77244, 76603, 77191, 77814, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Gordon N. Ridley seeks to appeal judgments of conviction for three counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(c), (d). The trial court has certified that (1) these are plea-bargain cases and Ridley has no right of appeal, and (2) Ridley has waived the right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Jeff Rose, Justices Field and Toth Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: December 21, 2018
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.