Isidro Ramos v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00446-CR Isidro RAMOS, Appellant v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR9685 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of conviction for Trial Court No. 2015CR9685, Count II that reads “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVE WITH COUNTS III, VI, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I” is REFORMED to read “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENT WITH COUNTS III, IV, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I.”; the judgment of conviction for Trial Court No. 2015CR9685, Count III that reads “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVE WITH COUNTS II, VI, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I” is REFORMED to read “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENT WITH COUNTS II, IV, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I.”; the amended judgment of conviction for Trial Court No. 2015CR9685, Count IV that reads “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVE WITH COUNTS II, III, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I” is REFORMED to read “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENT WITH COUNTS II, III, V, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I.”; the amended judgment of conviction for Trial Court No. 2015CR9685, Count V that reads “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVE WITH COUNTS II, III, IV, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I” is REFORMED to read “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENT WITH COUNTS II, III, IV, VI BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I.”; and the judgment of conviction for Trial Court No. 2015CR9685, Count VI that reads “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONSECUTIVE WITH COUNTS II, III, IV, V BUT CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I” is REFORMED to read “THIS SENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENT WITH COUNTS II, III, IV, V BUT

CONSECUTIVELY WITH COUNT I.” The trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED AS REFORMED.

SIGNED December 27, 2018.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice