Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 8, 2019

George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: George M. Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV Trial court case number: 36282 Trial court: 21st District Court of Washington County Appellant, George M. Bishop. III, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s “Modified Judgment of Partially Probated Suspension.” And, appellant has filed a motion to stay “the active suspension” pending resolution of the appeal. We deny the motion to stay. See Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 3.13 (providing judgment of suspension may be stayed during pendency of appeal if district court finds, upon competent evidence, that appellant’s “continued practice of law does not pose a continuing threat to the welfare of [appellant’s] clients or to the public”); Favaloro v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 13 S.W.3d 831, 840 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, no pet.) (concluding appellant who did not show he filed trial court motion to stay suspension did not meet burden to prove continued practice of law did not pose threat).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: ___January 8, 2019___

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.