Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Casey Ray Tiller v. State

Casey Ray Tiller v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 12, 2019

Casey Ray Tiller v. State

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00153-CR

CASEY RAY TILLER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 32,056

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

ORDER Casey Ray Tiller appeals from his conviction of aggravated sexual assault of a child and the resulting sentence of seventy-five years’ confinement. Tiller’s notice of appeal was filed August 22, 2018. The clerk’s record was filed September 12, 2018, and the reporter’s record was filed November 2, 2018, making the appellant’s brief originally due December 3, 2018. This Court extended that briefing deadline twice, on appellant’s motions, resulting in a final due date of January 23, 2019. Counsel thereafter filed a third motion seeking an additional extension of the briefing deadline until February 1, 2019. On January 29, 2019, this Court denied counsel’s third motion to extend the deadline for filing the appellate brief and ordered counsel to file the brief on or before February 1, 2019 Because appellant’s brief has not been filed in the face of our January 29, 2019, order requiring that it be filed by February 1, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for a status hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Specifically, the trial court is directed to determine whether Tiller still desires to prosecute this appeal. Assuming Tiller still desires to prosecute the appeal, the trial court is directed to determine (1) why Tiller’s appellate brief has not been filed, (2) whether counsel is able to promptly complete and file the appellate brief, and (3) what circumstances exist, if any, that would mitigate against the issuance of an order requiring counsel to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for failing to obey our January 29, 2019, order.

The trial court is directed to make recommendations on how we should proceed in this matter, with the understanding that our primary goal is to obtain Tiller’s appellate brief as quickly

as possible so that we can move his appeal forward. The trial court may also address any other matters it deems appropriate. The hearing is to be conducted within fifteen days of the date of this order.

The trial court’s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). The reporter’s record of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental reporter’s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See id. All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s brief or (2) the supplemental appellate record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT Date: February 12, 2019

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.