Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson
Danielle Renee Cano v. Dennis Mark Anderson
Opinion
Opinion issued February 26, 2019
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00791-CV ——————————— DANIELLE RENEE CANO, Appellant V. DENNIS MARK ANDERSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2018-16260
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Danielle Renee Cano, has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.141; Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.