Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Zentech, Inc. and Ramesh Maini v. S. Rao Gunter

Zentech, Inc. and Ramesh Maini v. S. Rao Gunter
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 28, 2019

Zentech, Inc. and Ramesh Maini v. S. Rao Gunter

Opinion

Order filed February 28, 2019

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-19-00072-CV ____________ ZENTECH, INC. AND RAMESH MAINI, Appellants V. S. RAO GUNTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-80281 ORDER This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 10, 2018. Appellant timely filed a post judgment motion. The notice of appeal was due January 8, 2019.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on January 22, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal.

While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.