Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Charles Nickolous Linzey v. State

Charles Nickolous Linzey v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 20, 2019

Charles Nickolous Linzey v. State

Opinion

NUMBERS 13-18-00353-CR AND 13-18-00354-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CHARLES NICKOLOUS LINZEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 33rd District Court of Burnet County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam These causes are currently before the Court on appellant's third unopposed motion for extension of time to file the brief.1 The reporter’s record was filed on September 5,

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.).

2018, and appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). This Court has previously granted appellant two extensions of time totaling 129 days to file the brief, and appellant now seeks an additional 30 days, until April 11, 2019, to file the brief.

The Court GRANTS appellant’s third unopposed motion for extension to file the brief and ORDERS the Honorable Gary E. Prust to file the brief on or before April 11, 2019. The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief in this matter. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. If counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4).

PER CURIAM Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 20th day of March, 2019.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.