Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Wilfred Warren Sheppard v. State

Wilfred Warren Sheppard v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 24, 2019

Wilfred Warren Sheppard v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2019

NO. 03-19-00267-CR

Wilfred Warren Sheppard, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants Motion to Quash Indictment.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2019

NO. 03-19-00268-CR

Wilfred Warren Sheppard, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants Motion to Quash Indictment.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2019

NO. 03-19-00269-CR

Wilfred Warren Sheppard, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellants Motion to Quash Indictment.

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.