Ronald Adams v. State
Ronald Adams v. State
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00386-CV No. 02-18-00387-CV No. 02-18-00388-CV ___________________________ RONALD ADAMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court Nos. F17-3262-367, F17-3264-367, F18-1387-367
Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On May 31, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam Delivered: July 3, 2019
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.