Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Sandra Stone, as Independent of the Estate of James E. Stone v. Charline Langford

Sandra Stone, as Independent of the Estate of James E. Stone v. Charline Langford
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 10, 2019

Sandra Stone, as Independent of the Estate of James E. Stone v. Charline Langford

Opinion

NO. 12-19-00007-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS SANDRA STONE, AS INDEPENDENT § APPEAL FROM THE EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES E. STONE, APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT AT LAW V. CHARLINE LANGFORD, APPELLEE § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Sandra Stone, as Independent Executrix of the Estate of James E. Stone, Appellant, and Charline Langford, Appellee, filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states that the parties compromised and settled their differences. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, the joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). In accordance with the parties’ agreement, costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

Opinion delivered July 10, 2019.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT JULY 10, 2019

NO. 12-19-00007-CV

SANDRA STONE, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES E. STONE, Appellant V. CHARLINE LANGFORD, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV1513613)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the joint motion to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the joint motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.