Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

James H. Johnson v. Crockett Police

James H. Johnson v. Crockett Police
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 20, 2019

James H. Johnson v. Crockett Police

Opinion

Opinion issued August 20, 2019

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00048-CV ——————————— JAMES H. JOHNSON, Appellant V. CROCKETT POLICE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-34029

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, James H. Johnson, attempts to appeal the trial court’s dismissal of the underlying case in a judgment signed on July 8, 2014. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction because appellant’s notice of appeal filed over four years later, on January 8, 2019, was untimely.

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to ninety days after the date the judgment is signed if, within thirty days after the judgment is signed, any party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a), (g). The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.

Appellant’s January 8, 2019 notice of appeal was untimely filed over four years after the deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1. On June 6, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless he demonstrated this Court had jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant failed to file a response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Landau, and Countiss.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.