Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Richard Kaminski v. TTS Logistics, Inc. a California Corporation

Richard Kaminski v. TTS Logistics, Inc. a California Corporation
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 8, 2019

Richard Kaminski v. TTS Logistics, Inc. a California Corporation

Opinion

Order filed October 8, 2019

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-19-00528-CV ____________ RICHARD KAMINSKI, Appellant V. TTS LOGISTICS, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-18509 ORDER This is an appeal from an order signed March 20, 2019. Appellant timely filed a post judgment motion to set aside. The notice of appeal was due June 18, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on July 1, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.