Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2019

Rahool Amin Makani Imad A/K/A Rahool Makani v. Matthew Heckel, Dan Holt, and Kris Bergmann

Rahool Amin Makani Imad A/K/A Rahool Makani v. Matthew Heckel, Dan Holt, and Kris Bergmann
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 15, 2019

Rahool Amin Makani Imad A/K/A Rahool Makani v. Matthew Heckel, Dan Holt, and Kris Bergmann

Opinion

Opinion issued October 15, 2019

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00269-CV ——————————— RAHOOL AMIN MAKANI IMAD A/K/A RAHOOL MAKANI, Appellant V. MATTHEW HECKEL, DAN HOLT, AND KRIS BERGMANN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 431st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 18-2813-431

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment order signed on December 7, 2018. Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 23, 2019. Three extensions were granted until August 12, 2019, the last of which state that no further extensions would be granted. On August 20, 2019, we issued a notice advising appellant that unless the brief was filed within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Appellant neither timely filed a brief nor requested an extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (the appellate court may dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to file appellant’s brief).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.