Ruth Bacardi & Company v. Najib Baoulos
Ruth Bacardi & Company v. Najib Baoulos
Opinion
Opinion issued December 10, 2019
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00869-CV ——————————— RUTH BACARDI & COMPANY, Appellant V. NAJIB BAOULOS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2016-44867
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Ruth Bacardi & Company, has neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellee subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. More than ten days have passed and appellant failed to respond to the motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Hightower.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.