Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Richard Leon Rose v. Peter G. Adams

Richard Leon Rose v. Peter G. Adams
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 2, 2020

Richard Leon Rose v. Peter G. Adams

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00792-CV Richard Leon ROSE, Appellant v. Peter G. ADAMS, Appellee From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CI04064 Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 2, 2020 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant Richard Leon Rose filed a notice of appeal in this court on November 7, 2019.

Appellant was required to pay $205.00 in filing fees to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 2 Appellant did not timely pay the required fees. On December 5, 2019, when the fees remained unpaid, we ordered Appellant to provide written proof to this court not later than December 16,

The Honorable Monique Diaz is the presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District Court.

See also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b)(1) (filing fee $100.00); id. §§ 51.0051, .208 (additional fee $50.00); id. § 51.851(b) (electronic filing fee $20.00); id. § 51.941(a) (services for indigents fee $25.00); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07–9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B.l.(a).

04-19-00792-CV

2019, that the filing fees have been paid or Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing fees. See id. We warned Appellant that if he failed to respond as ordered, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C., No. 04-05-00532-CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.).

To date, Appellant has not paid the fees or filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.