Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard

Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 9, 2020

Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard Appellate case number: 01-17-00918-CV Trial court case number: CV-0077741 Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County Appellants, Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam, have filed a motion to reopen this appeal, which we construe as a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.5.

Appellants’ motion is untimely. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.5. In addition, this Court’s plenary power expired on December 20, 2018, which is 30 days after it denied appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration. TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b). After its plenary power expires, this Court cannot vacate or modify its judgment except as provided in Rule 19.3, which does not apply here. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.3.

Accordingly, we dismiss appellants’ motion for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: January 9, 2020

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.