Keith Head v. State
Keith Head v. State
Opinion
Order filed January 16, 2020
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-18-00925-CR ____________ KEITH HEAD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 399th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011CR6417B ORDER Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1969). The motion was granted and an order to that effect issued.
In response, we have received documentation that the record was sent to appellant but have not received the certification from the clerk of the court as to the date on which delivery of the record to appellant was made.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 56th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain and Hassan.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.