in Re Jules Dylan Stuer
in Re Jules Dylan Stuer
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed February 13, 2020
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00177-CV IN RE JULES DYLAN STUER, Relator Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05507 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek
Before the Court is relator’s February 10, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, and noting relator has failed to provide us with any mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
200177F.P05
–2–
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.