Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Zachery Angel Lucero v. State

Zachery Angel Lucero v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 27, 2020

Zachery Angel Lucero v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00064-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00065-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00066-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.