Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Geronimo Francisco Rivera A/K/A Geronimo Francisco Rivera-Lozoya v. State

Geronimo Francisco Rivera A/K/A Geronimo Francisco Rivera-Lozoya v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 25, 2020

Geronimo Francisco Rivera A/K/A Geronimo Francisco Rivera-Lozoya v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § GERONIMO FRANCISCO RIVERA § No. 08-19-00223-CR A/K/A GERONIMO FRANCISCO RIVERA-LOZOYA, § Appeal from the Appellant, § 171® District Court v. § of El Paso County, Texas THE STATE OF TEXAS, § (TC# 20150D05113) State. § § ORDER Rebecca Macias, court reporter for the El Paso Council of Judges, has asked for a sixth extension of time in which to file the Reporter's Record in the above-captioned case. On February 24, 2020, this Court, after having granted third and fourth extensions request using language that indicated that the extensions were final, granted a fifth extension request, again indicating that the extension granted was final.!

In her sixth extension request, Macias cites not only the length of the transcript in this case

' We noted that Geronimo Francisco Rivera was sentenced on June 24, 2019 and filed his notice of appeal on September 3, 2019. He is presently incarcerated.. His attorney notes that he requested the reporter’s record on September 10, 2019. The Clerk’s Record was timely filed; but the reporter’s record has not. Ms. Macias’s latest request would make the reporter’s record due more than six months beyond its ordinary due date.

and other cases she is working on as reasons for the delay, but also having to substitute in for various courts due to a local court reporter shortage with the El Paso Council of Judges caused by retirements, hiring issues, and the running of double and triple dockets. Macias also states that due to the COVID-19 outbreak, she and another court reporter are. the only ones currently working at the courthouse and that they are on rotation with each alternately working every other day unless both are needed at once.

Consistent with the Texas Supreme Court’s First Emergency Order,” this Court will strive to strike an appropriate balance between accommodating requests for deadline extensions and maintaining regular order. Although in ordinary circumstances a request like this would be denied, given the extraordinary circumstances presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court GRANTS: the sixth extension request until April 24, 2020, However, the Court observes that while the COVID-19 pandemic has created logistical issues that all courts in this State must work around, all courts must to the extent possible endeavor to maintain regular order as required by the Open Courts Provision of the Texas Constitution. As such, this Court is obligated to continue processing appeals and other proceedings. The Court further notes that frequent extension requests causing substantial delays to the resolution of appeals—including multiple extension requests filed after this Court issued final deadline orders— predated the COVID-19 outbreak and suggest that, at least in part, such delays may be the result of a systemic issue in the way court reporters are utilized by the trial courts of El Paso County.

Even under these circumstances, this Court maintains the ability to exercise its right to enforce orders against a court reporter, clerk, or litigant through contempt, by writ of mandamus, or otherwise to the extent necessary to preserve and enforce our own jurisdiction. See, e.g., O'Neal

? Supreme Court of Texas, First Emergency Order Regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster, Misc. Docket 20- 9042 (Joint Order, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Misc. Docket 20-007)

v, Stovall, 580 S.W.2d 130, (Tex.App.—Austin 1979, orig. proceeding)(appellate court can issue writ of mandamus against court reporter to remedy tardy filing because failure to file transcript interferes with appellate court's jurisdiction). Such orders may include, but are not limited to, : enjoining a court reporter from taking on new work until previous other work has been completed.

Therefore, Macias is admonished to reassess her workload, to prioritize tasks accordingly, to keep this Court appraised of her progress in fulfilling her duties to file transcripts with this.

Court, and to make alternative arrangements as needed. Furthermore, the El Paso Council of Judges is admonished to plan for contingencies in the event that court reporters may be needed to complete backlogged transcripts, and to ensure the court reporters have the resources necessary to meet both their obligations to the trial courts and to this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25" day of March, 2020.

OU JEFF AVLEY" CHIEF JUSTICE

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ. a

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.