Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Curtis Strahan v. State

Curtis Strahan v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 1, 2020

Curtis Strahan v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00856-CR

Curtis Strahan, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 77106, THE HONORABLE PAUL L. LEPAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Curtis Strahan seeks to appeal from a judgment adjudicating guilt for the offense of assault of a public servant. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01. The trial court’s original certification in the record stated that this is a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (requiring that trial court enter certification of defendant’s right of appeal “each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order” ). Because the record did not support this certification, we abated the appeal and instructed the trial court to prepare and file in this Court an amended certification that accurately reflects Strahan’s right of appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The trial court has now filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing an amended certification stating that defendant has waived the right of appeal. This certification is supported by the record, which contains a document signed by Strahan stating that he confesses to violating the terms of his community supervisions and that he “waives any right to a motion for new trial and appeal.” Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May 1, 2020 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.