Gregory Joseph Finster v. Kristine Lawrence and Jacqueline Finster
Gregory Joseph Finster v. Kristine Lawrence and Jacqueline Finster
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00025-CV ___________________________ GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER, Appellant V. KRISTINE LAWRENCE AND JACQUELINE FINSTER, Appellees
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-009351-1
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On July 6, 2020, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam Delivered: July 30, 2020
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.