Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2020

Harris County, Texas and Kevin Vailes v. Barbara Coats, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamail Amron, and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron, And Ali Amron, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron

Harris County, Texas and Kevin Vailes v. Barbara Coats, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamail Amron, and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron, And Ali Amron, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 17, 2020

Harris County, Texas and Kevin Vailes v. Barbara Coats, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamail Amron, and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron, And Ali Amron, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron

Opinion

Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration and Opinions Dissenting to the Denial of En Banc Reconsideration filed September 17, 2020.

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-17-00732-CV ____________ HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND KEVIN VAILES, Appellants V. BARBARA COATS, INDIVIDUALLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JAMAIL AMRON, DECEASED, AND AS HEIR TO THE ESTATE OF JAMAIL AMRON, DECEASED; AND ALI AMRON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HEIR TO THE ESTATE OF JAMAIL AMRON, DECEASED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012-5551 ORDER DENYING EN BANC RECONSIDERATION The motion for en banc reconsideration filed by appellees Barbara Coats, Individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamail Amron, Deceased, and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron, Deceased; and Ali Amron, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Jamail Amron, Deceased is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.2, 49.7; see also Pinto Tech. Ventures, L.P. v. Sheldon, 526 S.W.3d 428, 436 (Tex. 2017); Saenz v. Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Underwriters, 925 S.W.2d 607, 612 (Tex. 1996) (motion for en banc reconsideration properly overruled when vote evenly divided).

/s/ Kevin Jewell Justice

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher, Wise, Jewell, Bourliot, Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant. (Justice Hassan not participating).

Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant voted to grant en banc reconsideration.

Justice Bourliot filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Zimmerer and Spain joined, and Justice Poissant joined in part on the merits only.

Justice Spain filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Poissant joined.

Justice Poissant filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Zimmerer joined.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.