in Re Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC v. .
in Re Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC v. .
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00363-CV IN RE PERMIAN HIGHWAY PIPELINE LLC Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 23, 2020 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 20, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted on July 22, 2020. The real party in interest filed a response to which relator replied.
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator did not show it is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15945, styled Permian Highway Pipeline LLC v. Henry J. Limited Partnership and Central Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., pending in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas. The Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III signed the order at issue in this original proceeding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.