Austin Callaway Sellers v. State
Austin Callaway Sellers v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-20-00359-CR
AUSTIN CALLAWAY SELLERS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 47th District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No. 28,416-A, Honorable Dan L. Schaap, Presiding January 12, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Austin Callaway Sellers, appeals his conviction for assault of a family or household member,1 enhanced, and sentence to six years’ confinement. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The trial court sentenced appellant on November 4, 2020. Because no motion for new trial was filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due within thirty days after sentence
The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, a court of appeals has no option but to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Id. When a notice of appeal, but no motion for an extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day extension period, an appellate court lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. 2 Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc).
By letter of December 22, 2020, we notified appellant of the consequences of his late notice of appeal and directed him to file a response showing how we have jurisdiction by December 31. Appellant did not file a response and has had no further communication with this Court.
Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.3
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.