Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2021

State v. James T. 'Tully' Shahan, in His Official Capacities as County Judge, Mark Frerich, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Joe Montalvo, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Dennis Dodson, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Tim Ward, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County

State v. James T. 'Tully' Shahan, in His Official Capacities as County Judge, Mark Frerich, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Joe Montalvo, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Dennis Dodson, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Tim Ward, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 15, 2021

State v. James T. 'Tully' Shahan, in His Official Capacities as County Judge, Mark Frerich, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Joe Montalvo, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Dennis Dodson, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Tim Ward, in His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 15, 2021 No. 04-19-00716-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS ex. rel. Todd A. Durden, In His Official Capacity as County Attorney, Appellant v. James T. 'Tully' SHAHAN, In His Official Capacities as County Judge, Mark Frerich, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Joe Montalvo, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Dennis Dodson, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Tim Ward, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County, Appellee From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 4866 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a reply brief on December 15, 2020. On December 29, 2020, Appellees filed a motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief and the sur-reply brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3, 38.6(c).

Appellees’ motion is GRANTED. Appellees’ sur-reply brief is deemed timely filed.

It is so ORDERED January 15, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.