in Re Scott and Tana Kehoe
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00004-CV
IN RE Scott KEHOE and Tana Kehoe, Relators Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 13, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus, but only when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.