in Re Tryone Berry
Opinion
Order filed January 21, 2021.
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-21-00029-CR NO. 14-21-00030-CR NO. 14-21-00031-CR NO. 14-21-00032-CR NO. 14-21-00033-CR
____________ IN RE TYRONE BERRY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Appeal from the 263rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 1654103, 1654105, 1654106, 1654107 & 1654108
ORDER
On January 14, 2021, relator Tyrone Berry filed five petitions for writs of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Amy Martin, presiding judge of the 263rd District Court of Harris County, to rule on relator’s motions for bond reduction.
Relator’s petitions do not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (“The person filing the petition must certify that he or she has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record.”); 52.7(a)(1) (requiring relator to file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); 52.7(a)(2) (requiring relator to file with petition properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with matter complained).1 By this order, the court gives relator ten days’ notice that the petitions will be dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 52.3(j), 52.7(a)(1), and 52.7(a)(2) unless the deficiencies are cured. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.