in Re Bradley Jared Barton
Opinion
Order filed January 26, 2021.
In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-21-00039-CR ____________
IN RE BRADLEY JARED BARTON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1206429 ORDER
On January 15, 2021, relator Bradley Jared Barton filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Nikita Harmon, presiding judge of the 176th District Court of Harris County, to rescind the December 7, 2010 order granting the State’s motion to restrict relator’s privileges.
Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (“The person filing the petition must certify that he or she has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record.”); 52.7(a)(1) (requiring relator to file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding”); 52.7(a)(2) (requiring relator to file with petition properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with matter complained).1 By this order, the court gives relator ten days’ notice that the petition will be dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 52.3(j), 52.7(a)(1), and 52.7(a)(2) unless the deficiencies are cured. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.