in Re Jose Antonio Ortiz
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00033-CV
IN RE Jose Antonio ORTIZ, Relator Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice
Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus, but only when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relator has not satisfied this burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.