Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan

Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided February 10, 2021
Donald E. Ghidoni v. Stone Oak, Inc., Hill Country Water Works Company and Hill Country S.A., LTD. and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00055-CV

Donald E. GHIDONI,

Appellant v.

STONE OAK INC., Hill Country Water Works Company, Hill Country S.A., Ltd., and Nancy Ghidoni-Meehan,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1992-CI-17421

Honorable Antonio Arteaga, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2021

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant seeks to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment. This court has jurisdiction to review the denial of a summary judgment motion only when the parties file competing motions for summary judgment, and the trial court grants one motion but denies the other. Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett, 164 S.W.3d 656, 661 (Tex. 2006). The record shows that competing motions for summary judgment were not filed in the trial court. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. See Humphreys v. Caldwell, 888 S.W.2d 469, 470 (Tex. 1994) (holding denial of summary judgment is not appealable); see also Lehmann v. Har Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (absent an appealable interlocutory order or final judgment in writing, appellate court has no jurisdiction). We therefore issued an order instructing appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant responded but did not establish that this court has jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. 42.3(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.