Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores
Vincent Krussow v. Martin G. Anguiano, Jr., Valerie Nicole Valdez, and Nancy Ann Flores
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00491-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ VINCENT KRUSSOW, Appellant, v. MARTIN G. ANGUIANO, JR., VALERIE NICOLE VALDEZ, AND NANCY ANN FLORES, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal. Appellant’s motion indicates the matter is still pending in the trial court and requests that this Court disregard and dismiss all of appellant’s motions and attempted appeal.
On December 20, 2020, this Court issued an Order of Abatement instructing the trial court to determine if appellant desires to prosecute the appeal along with other matters related to the record.
The Court, having considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Therefore, this cause is hereby reinstated, appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the cause dismissed.
Furthermore, appellant’s motion to temporarily suspend appeal venue is hereby dismissed as moot. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed on the 25th day of February, 2021.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.