in Re N^3 Owner, L.P. D/B/A N^3 L.P., WRIA 2017-3, L.P., WRIA 2017-2, L.P., WRIA 2017-7, L.P., AIRW 2016-6, L.P., WRIA 2016-7, L.P., WRIA 2017-5, L.P., WRIA 2017-6, L.P. and WRIA 2017-4, L.P.
in Re N^3 Owner, L.P. D/B/A N^3 L.P., WRIA 2017-3, L.P., WRIA 2017-2, L.P., WRIA 2017-7, L.P., AIRW 2016-6, L.P., WRIA 2016-7, L.P., WRIA 2017-5, L.P., WRIA 2017-6, L.P. and WRIA 2017-4, L.P.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00093-CV ___________________________ IN RE N^3 OWNER, L.P. D/B/A N^3 L.P., WRIA 2017-3, L.P., WRIA 2017-2, L.P., WRIA 2017-7, L.P., AIRW 2016-6, L.P., WRIA 2016-7, L.P., WRIA 2017-5, L.P., WRIA 2017-6, L.P. AND WRIA 2017-4, L.P., Relators
Original Proceeding 96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-318102-20
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Womack, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Per Curiam Delivered: April 9, 2021
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.