Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

in Re Olga Maria Narro and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola

in Re Olga Maria Narro and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided April 14, 2021
in Re Olga Maria Narro and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00081-CV

IN RE Olga Maria NARRO and Jose Elias Narro Arreazola, Relators Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 14, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 2

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 34885, styled In re J.E.N., pending in the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas, the Honorable Roland C. Andrade presiding. 2 Because we agree with relators that the circumstances do not require an abatement under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2, we also deny the Real Parties’ motion to abate.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.