in Re: Joseph Dingler

Denied and Opinion Filed April 23, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00263-CV

IN RE JOSEPH DINGLER, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-05083

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Relator’s April 21, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus complains about various eviction-related matters. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3, 52.7. Moreover, because relator has not submitted an adequate record, we are unable to conduct a meaningful review of his claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Having denied the petition, we also deny relator’s request for emergency relief as moot.

/Bill Pedersen, III/ 210263f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE