in Re: Paul Rudnicki
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed May 11, 2021
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00127-CV
IN RE PAUL RUDNICKI, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-00644
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia
Relator’s February 26, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial court’s order denying leave to designate a responsible third party. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must demonstrate that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition, the response, and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
Schenck, J. dissenting 210127F.P05
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.