Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. NGW43482016's and Thomas J. Brownfield

in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. NGW43482016's and Thomas J. Brownfield
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided May 26, 2021
in Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. NGW43482016's and Thomas J. Brownfield

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00190-CV

IN RE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON and Thomas J. Brownfield, Relators

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 26, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI16323, styled Implicity Management Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez presiding.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.