in Re Regino Palacios
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00209-CR
IN RE Regino PALACIOS, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 2, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for extension of time to file his petition. We may issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate remedy exists. See State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). Having reviewed the petition, we conclude relator has not satisfied this burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.