Court of Appeals of Texas, 2021

in Re Agustin Estrada, Individually and Doing Business as a E TRUCKING

in Re Agustin Estrada, Individually and Doing Business as a E TRUCKING
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided June 9, 2021
in Re Agustin Estrada, Individually and Doing Business as a E TRUCKING

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00221-CV

IN RE Agustin ESTRADA, individually and doing business as AE TRUCKING, Relator Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 9, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We have the power to issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and record, we conclude relator has not satisfied this burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-18478 pending in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tina Torres presiding. In the mandamus petition, relator also named the Honorable Peter Sakai and the Honorable Angelica Jimenez as respondents.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.