in Re Marquise D. Hodge
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-21-00113-CR
IN RE MARQUISE D. HODGE
Original Proceeding
From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court No. 44293CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition, filed on May 25, 2021, is denied. 1
Relator also presented within his petition a motion for leave to file his petition for writ of mandamus. A motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is required when relief by mandamus is sought from the Court of Criminal Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 72.1. The requirement for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus at the court of appeals level was eliminated in 1997. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52, Notes and Comments. Thus, under the applicable rules, if mandamus relief is sought from an intermediate court of appeals, such as the Tenth Court of Appeals, a motion for leave to file the petition is unnecessary. The petition was filed without regard to the motion for leave to file it. Accordingly, the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Dawson, 10-19-00427-CR, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 10725 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 11, 2019, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication). 2
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson, and
Justice Davis 3
Petition denied
Motion dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed June 23, 2021
Do not publish [OT06]
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.